UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer insisted on Monday that he would never have appointed Peter Mandelson as his ambassador in Washington if he had known the full extent of the diplomat’s relationship with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Advertisement
The comments, Starmer’s first since he sacked Mandelson last week, come as the prime minister faces growing questions about his judgment, including from his own Labour MPs.
Starmer, whose popularity has tanked since taking office in July 2024, has endured several days of negative front pages in UK newspapers with some even suggesting he is on borrowed time.
The premier backed Mandelson last Wednesday, only to fire him the following day after emails showed that Mandelson had encouraged Epstein to “fight for early release” shortly before he was sentenced to 18 months in prison in 2008 for procuring a child for prostitution.
“Had I known then what I know now, I’d have never appointed him,” said Starmer, who told broadcasters that Mandelson had been properly vetted before his appointment.
Advertisement
Some Labour MPs have questioned why Starmer appointed the former government minister when it was public knowledge that he had remained friendly with Epstein long after his conviction.