The Secure Rural Schools program has funded schools in more than 700 counties across 41 states, but the money is never guaranteed longterm.
A financial crisis is looming in rural school districts across the country that many people have never heard of, say local officials.
Communities in 700-plus counties and 41 U.S. states with federally protected forest lands are exempt from property taxes, a primary revenue source for local school districts.
In 1908, Congress required logging companies, ranchers, and other businesses that made money on resources removed from federally protected lands to give back a share of their revenues to counties for local school operations and municipal road projects, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service.
Over the years, the American timber industry faced declining revenues amid factors such as the digital age and subsequent efforts for paperless workplaces, the protection of threatened species, wildfires, and preservation measures in the interest of tourism.
In 2000, the Secure Rural Schools program replaced the revenue-sharing arrangement with intricate formulas to support the counties and their school districts, but the amounts keep decreasing, say officials. And the federal money isn’t guaranteed longterm.
The deadline to continue the Secure Rural Schools program in the 2025 federal budget is now approaching. In recent years, Congress funded the program in multi-year increments, though there was a lapse in 2016 with no funding.
“This affects us massively. This is a lifeline for rural America,” Jamie Green, superintendent for the Trinity Alps Unified School District in Weaverville, California, told The Epoch Times on Aug. 23. “All we want is just enough to run our schools.”
Trinity Alps received about $600,000 for the 2023–2024 academic year, which amounts to about 5 percent of the current budget and is less than half of what it received 20 years ago before adjusting for inflation, Green said.
He said that the district would have to lay off seven of its 100 full-time employees or levy a significant tax hike if the federal funding doesn’t come through.
The district serves 664 students in grades pre-kindergarten through 12 in an isolated, mountainous area an hour away from the nearest city, Redding. Green said it’s a great place for hunting, hiking, and fishing, but Trinity County is also the poorest of the Golden State’s 58 counties, and money is tight for most families.
Trinity County’s dying sawmill industry is sustained in part by Canadian lumber companies, because the fir, pine, and cedar trees the area is known for aren’t being harvested on a large scale anymore, Green said.
Green has made multiple trips to Washington in recent years to lobby for continued Secure Rural Schools funding, most recently in July ahead of the September deadline for the 2025 fiscal year budget. He said many school leaders across the country can’t afford to lobby, so those who can get to the capital speak for all affected schools and treat this as a bipartisan issue.
“It’s exhausting,” he said. “We should have a program that funds schools for more than three years.”
Oregon led the nation in Secure Rural School funding last year with $50.67 million. Of that total, Lane County, which surrounds the Eugene metro area, received $8.23 million. Tony Scurto, Lane Education Service District superintendent, told The Epoch Times on Aug. 26 that a funding loss or delay from that program would have minimal impact in districts because the state has an equalization formula that assures adequate funding for all schools.
Other notable state totals last year include California’s $35.75 million, Idaho’s $22.85 million, and Montana’s $14.20 million.
Lonnie Hunt, president of the volunteer-run National Forest Counties and Schools Coalition, said he visits Washington to lobby lawmakers once or twice a year. Legislators have proposed making Secure Rural Schools a permanent program, but those proposals rarely make it out of committee. Funding ends up getting approved when it’s attached to an appropriations bill for something not even remotely related to rural schools. Hunt added that the latest proposal is attached to the Republican version of the Farm Bill.
Hunt’s local school district is in Houston County, an area with pine forests along the Louisiana border and not actually near the city of Houston. Secure Rural Schools revenues there decreased from $937,734 in 2001 to $315,422 last year. He said school leaders and teachers across several states are nervous about layoffs after this school year because the status of the program for the 2025 fiscal year remains undetermined.
“It’s really kind of ridiculous that these rural communities have to sweat this out,” Hunt said. “This should be about Congress living up to a promise made over 100 years ago.”
Last year, Idaho Republican Sens. Mike Crapo and Jim Risch, along with Oregon Sens. Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley, both Democrats, sponsored bipartisan legislation to extend Secure Rural Schools funding through 2026. It was approved by the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources but has yet to be decided on by the full legislature. In the House of Representatives, a companion bill was introduced by Joe Neguse (D-Colorado), Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Washington) and Val Hoyle (D-Oregon), according to a Dec. 15, 2023, news release issued by Crapo’s office.
“I am pleased to see such a strong vote for our rural counties. We need to work to increase forest management and bring back historic timber revenue, but, in the meantime, we have an obligation to these communities,” Risch said in the news release. “This committee vote is an important step, and Congress must continue to move to reauthorize SRS.”