The final vote to confirm Tulsi Gabbard to the position of director of national intelligence will likely take place Tuesday or Wednesday.
The Senate voted on Feb. 10 to invoke cloture on the nomination of Tulsi Gabbard to the position of director of national intelligence, bringing the former congresswoman one step closer to confirmation.
The 52–46 vote means senators have 30 hours to debate the nomination before taking a final vote on Gabbard’s confirmation.
Senate Democrats are unlikely to yield their debate time in an effort to slow down the confirmation process of President Donald Trump’s political appointees, which means the final vote will likely come either late Tuesday or early Wednesday.
Gabbard’s nomination to lead the nation’s intelligence community was highly scrutinized during the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence’s initial public hearing on the matter on Jan. 30.
Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle expressed skepticism about Gabbard’s fitness for the role, given her previous support for intelligence leaker Edward Snowden and her previous opposition to a law that allows the federal government to indirectly collect intelligence on American citizens without a warrant.
Gabbard ultimately prevailed in the Committee’s initial round of voting, securing a party-line vote of 9–8 after convincing Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Todd Young (R-Ind.) to give their endorsement.
Gabbard assured the committee that she would not pardon Snowden unless directed to do so by the president. She acknowledged that the former National Security Agency intelligence contractor broke the law but refused to describe him as a “traitor.”
She said she supported Snowden’s efforts in exposing previously unknown programs through which the government solicited the assistance of tech companies to spy on American citizens.
Likewise, Gabbard said that she had reconsidered her position on FISA 702, a controversial law that allows American intelligence agencies to indirectly collect the sensitive private information of American citizens during surveillance of foreign targets.
“702 provides a unique tool and capability that is essential for our national security,” Gabbard said during the hearing, distancing herself from her long-stated belief that the law should be repealed.
Gabbard remains somewhat hostile to the intelligence community’s track record, however, accusing the various agencies of “bureaucratic mission-creep and empire-building.”
“For too long, faulty, inadequate, or weaponized intelligence have led to costly failures and the undermining of our national security and God-given freedoms enshrined in the Constitution,” Gabbard said during her testimony.
That stance may put her at odds with some in the Senate, but positions Gabbard similarly to Trump’s other nominees, who have largely expressed a desire for sweeping reform of the various federal agencies they have been appointed to.
Gabbard can only afford to lose two Republicans in the final vote later this week, as Vice President JD Vance will be traveling to Europe and will therefore be unable to cast a tie-breaking vote if needed.